Political and Family Drama Unfolds as Sharmila Claims Misrepresented Asset Share

In a recent development that has caught public attention, Sharmila, the Andhra Pradesh Congress Chief and candidate for the Kadapa MP position, made surprising revelations in her nomination affidavit. She declared that she had taken a loan of ₹82 crores from her brother Jagan Mohan Reddy and ₹19 lakhs from her sister-in-law Bharathi Reddy. This large sum being characterized as a loan has sparked significant debate about why Sharmila needed to borrow such an amount from her brother.

In response to the growing curiosity and criticism, Sharmila clarified the situation in a statement. She explained that the funds from her brother were not simply loans but part of her rightful share in the family property, which every brother should provide to his sister according to societal norms. Sharmila criticized the practice of viewing the sister's share of the inheritance as a favor or gift and condemned those who misrepresent such transfers as loans. She stressed that these are her rights, well known to God and her family.

She also emphasized the moral responsibility of maternal uncles, akin to that of mothers, to behave righteously and uphold familial duties and traditions. Sharmila's comments have brought to light the cultural expectations surrounding family inheritance and the ethical obligations of family members to one another.

This incident not only highlights the complexities involved in family and political finances but also reflects the societal values and legal obligations influencing property distribution among siblings in India.